...or until the State stops you.
As my last post eluded to (but didn't go into detail as I was using my iPhone), an individual was arrested last night at the Thomas Jefferson Memorial. For dancing.
Background: A brainchild of the liberty-minded folks at Bureaucrash, a flash mob-style dance party was months ago planned to go down at the TJ Memorial at 11:55PM on April 12th. Attendees were to have created their own playlist on their iPod or similar device, and were to rock out for about ten minutes to pay our respect to the ideas Jefferson proffered, wrapping up on the anniversary of his birthday.
Setting the Stage: A handful of us met at a local watering hole prior to the event. We strolled two miles southwest to the TJ Memorial enjoying each others company and the great night. We arrived at the TJ Memorial and spied other soon-to-be-dancers. More continued to arrive. Then the dancing began.
The Incident: Almost immediately the contracted security at the Memorial started to shoo us away from the Jefferson statue toward the stairs by the Tidal Basin. Dancers complied, albeit not as quickly as security seemed to hope. Backup was called. By this time, most of the dancers were on the steps, facing the Jefferson statue, singing happy birthday. Then we heard a yelp and saw one of our own pressed against a column, being handcuffed.
The agents of the State had singled out the dancer because, in my personal opinion, he/she had the unfortunate attribute of being the closest to them. Dancers immediately dug their video cameras and digital cameras from their pockets to document the incident. Our colleague, a captive of the State, complied with their commands and was ushered into the National Park Police room nearby. The rest of us, shocked by what we had witnessed, began to question the remaining State actors. Many of the others present had their own conversations, but in the interest of being factually accurate, I'm only going to address those I was a part of or witnessed.
One State actor, when asked if he would include in the report that our friend had not been making a sound, told us "Fuck the report" in an aggressive tone. His body language reinforced this. I questioned him on this and he noted that if I swore again I would join my friend in handcuffs. I then asked, "So, you have the authority to swear because you wear a badge?" to which he repeated his threat again. This was the same State agent that earlier had physically pushed me when he felt I wasn't moving fast enough. I also witnessed this same State actor telling another dancer that if he didn't "get out of my face" he too would be arrested.
It is very likely that, if this State actor felt that he could be held accountable for his unprofessionalism he would have behaved in a much different way. But, as the State extends immunity to its actors for virtually every offense, this was not the case. This is a clear example of why market incentives need to be injected into law enforcement.
The other officers on the scene responded to our questions by noting that they were just "doing our job". Fortunately a quick-witted member of our party pointed out that so too was Eichmann. Perhaps this will get their wheels turning? Get them to think for themselves? We'll see...
A half hour later, when most of the dancers had dispersed -- talking in groups near the Tidal Basin or following our friend as she was placed into a nearby paddy wagon -- I asked the remaining State actors, who by that time had begun to share their personal perspective of the incident with each other, to think about their actions. To contemplate how we had gotten to the point where, in their eyes, it was just to handcuff someone for engaging in activity that violated no one's rights. To try to see where we -- folks who recognized and supported the power of the natural rights-based ideas embodies by Jefferson -- were coming from and how their actions and utter lack of morality showed their true allegiance not to respect each individuals' rights, but to defend the State, flaws and all.
On top of that, these agents of the State are paid by money stolen from you and me.
Disgusting. I guess the State actors never bothered to look up and read the words chiseled into the stone above them: "I have sworn upon the altar of God eternal hostility against every from of tyranny over the mind of man."
Disgusting. I guess the State actors never bothered to look up and read the words chiseled into the stone above them: "I have sworn upon the altar of God eternal hostility against every from of tyranny over the mind of man."Update: Our friend, who we were initially told would be released at 3AM, was freed at 5AM. The charges, which started as disorderly conduct, were reduced to "interfering with an agency function." What type of vague legalese is that? What if an agent of the State asked my friend to unbutton the pants they wore and refused? Might they be charged under this same statute?
I point this out to highlight the difference between common law, which is clear and understandable, whereas man made legislation is not. While the former includes things we all agree with, such as not violating the rights of another by assaulting, raping, or killing them, the latter consists of incomprehensible, arbitrary rules as was seen.
In a system where the State has a coercive monopoly on the use of violence, they are accountable to none. The have virtual immunity for their actions. They don't need to cater to their customers as we cannot "fire" them. The don't need to compete by offering better service and lower prices because their salaries are paid for by money stolen from you and me.
Private defense agencies, on the other hand, would ensure accountability. Over-zealous employees would immediately be fired for fear of damaging the companies reputation, and thus, its bottom line. Company execs would strive to ensure that their employees were well-trained, especially in verbal judo, rather than resorting to costly physical alterations. Also, since the private defense agencies must make money from those willing to part with it, they would be efficient, and would only target those actions that truly violated someone's rights, rather than victimless crimes. Such as dancing.
A heartfelt thanks to all those that turned out last night, and especially to those who are now utilizing their own comparative advantages and networks to ensure the Jefferson One, as he/she has been dubbed, is assisted in this struggle against State aggressions.
For more on the Jefferson One, check out:
- FreeTheJefferson1.com
- Free The Jefferson 1 on Facebook

18 comments:
I would say unbelievable but it's not. It's like they don't even want us there.
I stopped going to DC a few years ago even thought there's all kinds of stuff that I would like to do there.
Of all places...
I don't get it. Why doesn't "Jefferson1" want her name out? Sounds like a lawyer who doesn't want to lose her job. No Nathan Hale is she.
Good post, Pete. But you're way off on your description of the common law. There's at least as much confusion over judge-made law as there is over legislation. Common law has many advantages over legislation, but being "clear and understandable" isn't one of them.
You dislike R+B??!!??!!??
WTF??!!??!!?
Are you deaf????
Cool report. Rampant authoritarianism duly noted. These guys have cut their teeth on shows like COPS, etc, and, having the Walter Mitty complex, 'hero in my own mind', gained their fantasy by manhandling you. Ironic, in the shadow of Jefferson. You know Common Law was rooted in Biblical Law, the Common Law being a codification of the practices of the Christian populations of Europe, England, etc. Predating the Reformation, Common Law was transmitted orally, as the translation of the Scriptures were not yet widespread. Of course, our Founders referenced it in the Declaration as "...the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God..". Even Jefferson, who many erroneously label a rationalist, nevertheless, said on the memorial there, "Can the Liberties of the people be secure, when we remove their only firm basis in the minds of the people, that those Liberties are the gift of God, and that they are not to be violated but by His wrath ?" Gee, not hardly a Deist, is he, as urban legend has it ? (Deists posit a God disconnected from His Creation, who certainly wouldn't show wrath, or love for that matter...). Ok why do I bring this up - well, like how many Public schools teach the Common Law or the Constitution, or the Founding Fathers, unedited ? Today, sadly, very, very few. So your ignorant State 'actors' are acting in sheer ignorance, of both the nature of State power, it's limitations & God's perrogative to be the both the source & definer of Law & Liberty (which Jefferson affirmed in the quote I gave, it's next to the one you quoted on the memorial). Our perplexing difficulty here is we have Biblically & historically ignorant population, both citizens & state 'actors', the former don't know enough to extercise their rights & duties, the latter don't know how to limit their aggressive use of force. Man, this could go real bad on us here. This is how a police state begins. Think Germany, 1933 ! Just read the words written in stone, up high ! Study the Constitution in one hand, the Scriptures in the other, along with some good (old) history texts, too. Hey, you brought back some memories from '99when we toured DC. I'm jealous if you live nearby DC ! Stop by for my homebrew.
Samuel Adams
A funny thing I just remembered happened at the Jefferson memorial. This is rich, and good if you hate (corrupt) Lawyers. Ok, so we're at the Jefferson Memorial, our tour guide, Marshall Foster, author & popular speaker on American History, is speaking to our approx. 100 member tour group. He's reading the inscriptions & providing voluminous & insightful background. A clueless ACLU type Lawyer - not part of our group - overhears Marshall quoting God (like, from the Jefferson quotes just above his head) - and this guy goes postal - trying to drag the state 'actors' over to stop him from speaking, on some purported complaint that he's mentioning God on State property. The guards /'actors' informed him that speaking to a group in an orderly fashion is perfectly Constitutional & protected speech. Boy, what a sharpie, this lawyer ! We mentioned to him, politely as could be, that 'separation of church & state' wasn't found in our US Constitution, but in Russia's. Besides, sir, note 3 of the 4 quotes in stone explicitly mention God. Do you suggest we re-chisel them to make you happy ? He absoutely wilted. Talk about having your worldview just run flat on all 4 tires, simultaneously. I tell this to my students as an example how we tend to form impressions based on what appeals to us, instead of what is actually true. This willfully ignorant man failed to read what was written right over his head, failed to know history, failed to know Constitutionally protected speech, attributed Communist Russia's 'separation' clause to our Constitution & attempted to deny essential rights to a Christian teacher teaching those who voluntarily joined him. And this character is going back into some courtroom nearby, taking action in the name of Law, blissfully ignornant of the source & nature of American Law & Liberty.
Samuel Adams
Next time, be sure to have someone video taping the whole thing. In HD.
Some fine verbal judo yourself Pete... I sincerely regret I was on the other side of the country, but I promise I was dancing unmolested in my own private Jefferson Memorial. Here's hoping I'm there for the next one!
Until then... Watch that mouth Pete... Just one more time...
Great report. Anyone interested in joining my efforts to develop the private security sector in libertarian directions is welcome to visit http://gil.guillory.googlepages.com/
The blind ignorance of those who enforce state power is truly frightening. However, the reference to "private defense agencies" conjures up images of Blackwater. Also truly frightening.
What a puerile event. The participants should have been monitored by babysitters, not by cops.
The reason Blackwater is able to operate with impunity is two-fold: 1st they're funded through contracts with the US government, and 2nd, they are operating in a theatre that gets little focused attention from the people who are paying their salaries (because they just aren't there, don't fully understand the situation, and aren't affected firsthand by the actions.) In this instance, since TJ's memorial would still be a public place, they would likely still be financed by public funds, but they would be held accountable to their actions, since they would affect the very people who pay the bills. FREE THE JEFFERSON 1!
"Samuel":
You have students? Please tell me you're kidding.
Thanks
http://gatwickcity.phpbb3now.com/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=541&p=2480#p2480
I'm joining the Free State Project. I'm tired of readings stories like this everyday in my RSS feeds.
It sounds like you were assaulted by one of the Park pigs. Swear out an affidavit, give it to the US Attorney's office, and tell them you want to press charges for assault.
As a lawyer, I have to agree with Greg N. re: common law.
Jolly good show.
Post a Comment